The Best Windows Flight Simulator Computer: Apple’s Intel iMac!
If you’ve been looking for an ideal PC to run Flight Simulator 2004 or XPlane , look no further. As unlikely as it might seem, Apple’s 20 inch Intel-powered Core Duo iMac is the best all-around personal computer I’ve found for running computer based flight simulations. I say that after spending a few hours during the past weekend flying a Grumman Tiger in Microsoft’s Flight Simulator 2004 using a yoke and pedal set by CH Pro and my Logitech S530 wireless keyboard and mouse.
What makes the iMac so ideal is its overall design. The screen sits at just the right height and has enough resolution to present a very realistic perspective of an aircraft instrument panel to the pilot. I set Flight Sim to use the iMac’s native 1680 x 1050 resolution, 32 bit color, at 30 frames per second. The ATI X1600 video set with 128MB of video memory had no problems producing a vivid, colorful, and artifact-free scene including very realistic looking clouds and some aircraft traffic. Overall machine response was excellent. Not once did I find myself concentrating more on the machine than the simulation. Controls were easily manipulated using my Logitech mouse and keyboard, though the latter was only required to release the parking brake. The only problem I had from a control standpoint was a mechanical one, i.e., trying to keep the yoke from slipping around on the keyboard shelf where it was mounted. I solved that by using a hand towel as filler between the bottom of the yoke and the shelf.
As you might guess, since I actually own a Grumman Cheetah, I was interested in setting the simulator up to fly one. While I couldn’t find a Cheetah model, I did find online a third-party model for a Grumman Tiger and, luckily, its colors are very close to those of my airplane. The model was actually built for Flight Simulator 2002 but seems to work well with FS2004 once I overrode warning messages about possible incompatibilities. The model’s major flaw is that its engine revs up to close to 3000 RPM and produces much too much power; after playing with the power levels a bit, I decided that a 2500 rpm setting was a relatively close approximation to what the Cheetah’s power really looks like. (Note: 2500 RPM is high for a real Cheetah; 2200-2300 during takeoff is more like it.)
The biggest artificiality of the simulator has nothing to do with FS 2004 itself. In an aircraft, especially when flying in the traffic pattern, you’ve got lots of visual clues out all the windows to help you establish, maintain, and manage your position. With only a single screen sitting in front of you, even if you can pick one of several views, flying a traffic pattern is a real bitch. Depth perception suffers in the sim, and lineup is always much harder in the simulator than in the real aircraft. But this is a problem with the sim, not a problem associated with flying the sim using the iMac.
Let me finish with a few words about the mechanics of my set-up. The CH Pro flight controllers were all USB .0 types and were hooked into the iMac via a Belkin 7 port USB 2.0 powered hub and a Belkin USB 2.0 switch (the latter lets me select which computer I want my USB peripherals to hook up to a computer). I wasn’t sure whether Windows XP Pro running on the iMac would have trouble seeing the peripherals, but it didn’t. That said, I did have to reload drivers the first two times I booted into XP Pro with the items attached.
The trim wheel on the CH Pro also is not marked or notched so you know where the center is, so I’m still trying to figure out how to rig it so that there’s adequate trim. It is possible to calibrate the yoke so you run out of trim in one direction.
But back to the iMac…
When I first considered setting up an iMac as both my primary Mac and Windows machine, how it would perform as a flight simulator was one of my primary concerns. Even considering I was using a 20 inch ADC Apple monitor with an AMD 2800XP powered PC, I believe the 20 inch Intel iMac is absolutely the best “PC” I’ve owned for running flight sims. It’s ironic that’s true, but it’s adding up with the other pluses of the machine to make the Intel iMac one of the best purchases I’ve ever made. I’m tickled pink!
What makes the iMac so ideal is its overall design. The screen sits at just the right height and has enough resolution to present a very realistic perspective of an aircraft instrument panel to the pilot. I set Flight Sim to use the iMac’s native 1680 x 1050 resolution, 32 bit color, at 30 frames per second. The ATI X1600 video set with 128MB of video memory had no problems producing a vivid, colorful, and artifact-free scene including very realistic looking clouds and some aircraft traffic. Overall machine response was excellent. Not once did I find myself concentrating more on the machine than the simulation. Controls were easily manipulated using my Logitech mouse and keyboard, though the latter was only required to release the parking brake. The only problem I had from a control standpoint was a mechanical one, i.e., trying to keep the yoke from slipping around on the keyboard shelf where it was mounted. I solved that by using a hand towel as filler between the bottom of the yoke and the shelf.
As you might guess, since I actually own a Grumman Cheetah, I was interested in setting the simulator up to fly one. While I couldn’t find a Cheetah model, I did find online a third-party model for a Grumman Tiger and, luckily, its colors are very close to those of my airplane. The model was actually built for Flight Simulator 2002 but seems to work well with FS2004 once I overrode warning messages about possible incompatibilities. The model’s major flaw is that its engine revs up to close to 3000 RPM and produces much too much power; after playing with the power levels a bit, I decided that a 2500 rpm setting was a relatively close approximation to what the Cheetah’s power really looks like. (Note: 2500 RPM is high for a real Cheetah; 2200-2300 during takeoff is more like it.)
The biggest artificiality of the simulator has nothing to do with FS 2004 itself. In an aircraft, especially when flying in the traffic pattern, you’ve got lots of visual clues out all the windows to help you establish, maintain, and manage your position. With only a single screen sitting in front of you, even if you can pick one of several views, flying a traffic pattern is a real bitch. Depth perception suffers in the sim, and lineup is always much harder in the simulator than in the real aircraft. But this is a problem with the sim, not a problem associated with flying the sim using the iMac.
Let me finish with a few words about the mechanics of my set-up. The CH Pro flight controllers were all USB .0 types and were hooked into the iMac via a Belkin 7 port USB 2.0 powered hub and a Belkin USB 2.0 switch (the latter lets me select which computer I want my USB peripherals to hook up to a computer). I wasn’t sure whether Windows XP Pro running on the iMac would have trouble seeing the peripherals, but it didn’t. That said, I did have to reload drivers the first two times I booted into XP Pro with the items attached.
The trim wheel on the CH Pro also is not marked or notched so you know where the center is, so I’m still trying to figure out how to rig it so that there’s adequate trim. It is possible to calibrate the yoke so you run out of trim in one direction.
But back to the iMac…
When I first considered setting up an iMac as both my primary Mac and Windows machine, how it would perform as a flight simulator was one of my primary concerns. Even considering I was using a 20 inch ADC Apple monitor with an AMD 2800XP powered PC, I believe the 20 inch Intel iMac is absolutely the best “PC” I’ve owned for running flight sims. It’s ironic that’s true, but it’s adding up with the other pluses of the machine to make the Intel iMac one of the best purchases I’ve ever made. I’m tickled pink!

6 Comments:
Andy... I hope you're right. I'm from Austin and after a lifetime of PC's, I bought the 20" Intel IMac... I'm also a pilot and a fan of flight simulation so you're comments were warmly received. I enjoy your blog...
By
Anonymous, at 8:56 PM
Andy,
Could please point me toward your third party where you got the Tiger. Have been looking but no joy. Took delivery of my plane (AA5B) this past Spring and hoping to still fly "her" when work &/or weather keeps me grounded.
Thanks,
Michael Ouimette
muttamour@yahoo.com
By
Michael Ouimette, at 10:52 PM
Nice post,useful info,thank you for sharing us!
By
Wholesale computer, at 9:12 PM
Andy,
Thanks for the input. I received a Mac from my wife and would like to add Windows so thatb i can use one of the FS's. I too own a plane, a Cessna 170B. I saw that some had an add on for it, but I can find it. Oh well. How difficult is it to add windows to Mac. Any experience with X Plane?
keep the Shiny Side Up.
Lou La Salle
N2485D
By
Anonymous, at 10:54 AM
It's easy to add Windows to a Mac. For using Windows with flight sims, I recommend using Boot Camp rather than any type of emulation software. You'll find the Boot Camp Assistant in the Applications/Utility folder. Just crank it up and follow its wizards.
Really about the only thing you need to be careful of is to have a retail or OEM copy of the Windows version you want to use rather than an upgrade versions. There are instructions out on the Net about how to create a CD/DVD that will work using an upgrade version, but it's probably a lot more work than most will want to do. You can find other words about what versions of Windows XP, Vista, or W7 to run at Apple's website in the Support section under the "Boot Camp" moniker, which may be a subsection of the Mac OS X section (either Leopard or Snow Leopard).
I like X-Plane but like the MS flight sims better for GA aircraft mainly because I can usually find more complete models. I use x-Plane mainly for F-14 sims because its carrier landing, air to air refueling, and some formation sims are really good.
By
Andy Foster, at 3:21 AM
I have never thought about using apple for flight simulator, now you have got me thinking. i need to investigate this for my own flightsim
By
Select Materials, at 6:03 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home